Occurrence and removal of emerging pollutants in urban sewage treatment plants using LC-QToF-MS suspect screening and quantification was written by Wiest, Laure;Gosset, Antoine;Fildier, Aurelie;Libert, Christine;Herve, Matthieu;Sibeud, Elisabeth;Giroud, Barbara;Vulliet, Emmanuelle;Bastide, Therese;Polome, Philippe;Perrodin, Yves. And the article was included in Science of the Total Environment in 2021.Quality Control of 2-(4-(1-Hydroxy-4-(4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)piperidin-1-yl)butyl)phenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid The following contents are mentioned in the article:
Urban wastewaters (WW) are a major vector of many emerging pollutants (EPs) to aquatic ecosystems, as urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are not designed to abate them. New methods are now critically necessary for a more comprehensive anal. of WW samples and for the assessment of the WWTP efficiency in EP removal. To this end, the present study aims to develop a methodol. to identify and quantify EPs, especially pharmaceutical residues and pesticides, in the raw and treated wastewater of 10 heterogeneous WWTPs in a highly urbanized territory in France over three sampling campaigns, through the following steps: (1) development and implementation of a suspect screening of EPs in WW samples, based on a solid phase extraction followed by an LC-QToF-MS anal.; (2) confirmation of their identification by reinjection of WW samples spiked with authentic anal. standards; (3) quantification of previously identified compounds by targeted LC-QToF-MS anal. in raw and treated effluents and assessment of their removal efficiency by WWTPs. Forty-one EPs, including 37 pharmaceutical residues (such as anti-depressive, anti-hypertensive, or antipsychotic drugs) and 4 pesticides, were identified by suspect screening. Some of them (e.g. milnacipran) are reported for the first time in urban WWTPs in this study. High variability in detection frequency and concentrations were observed in function of the EP and WWTP. Nevertheless, median removal rates were considered neg. or low for more than 50% of the EPs (resp. 4 and 17), leading to a quantification of significant concentrations in treated WW. Their release into receiving streams may thus lead to ecotoxicol. risks that should be evaluated in order to prevent any degradation of the exposed ecosystems. This study involved multiple reactions and reactants, such as 2-(4-(1-Hydroxy-4-(4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)piperidin-1-yl)butyl)phenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid (cas: 83799-24-0Quality Control of 2-(4-(1-Hydroxy-4-(4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)piperidin-1-yl)butyl)phenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid).
2-(4-(1-Hydroxy-4-(4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)piperidin-1-yl)butyl)phenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid (cas: 83799-24-0) belongs to piperidine derivatives. Piperidine has a role as a reagent, a protic solvent, a base, a catalyst, a plant metabolite, a human metabolite and a non-polar solvent. Several piperidine alkaloids isolated from natural herbs, were found to exhibit antiproliferation and antimetastatic effects on various types of cancers both in vitro and in vivo for example Piperine, Evodiamine, Matrine, Berberine and Tetrandine.Quality Control of 2-(4-(1-Hydroxy-4-(4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)piperidin-1-yl)butyl)phenyl)-2-methylpropanoic acid
Referemce:
Piperidine – Wikipedia,
Piperidine | C5H11N – PubChem